🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.